So upgrades and handling failures becomes trivial since the software controller can come with you to the new hardware. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raids. Im about to start a new server build for home media storage. Hardware is a much more robust and better performing option. Ive been hoping other people would post with some experience, because im in the middle of a decision and am leaning toward software but just basically fear the unknown. Softwareraid gegen hardwareraid im benchmarkvergleich. It seems that no matter if you use a hardware or a software raid controller, you should expect to lose performance when youre duplicating every write, which makes sense. Hardware raid offers better reliability compared to software raid. The reason i sought a hardware raid solution was due to the fact that for about 8 months i was running mdadm as a software raid 6 solution. I would generally agree with a preference for hardware vs. Regarding raid1e and 10 the main difference between 1e and 10 is that 1e uses an odd number of disk for providing protection, where as 10 uses an even number of disk.
I personally avoid marvell integrated raid like the plague due to extremely poor performance worse by far than windows raid, but some of their actual hardware solutions are alright. Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica. Even if you dont go with one of the fancier software controllers like zfs or btrfs id still recommend going with a software raid. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raid s. Here are some tips on raid levels and some feedback on the software vs. Software raid is os dependent using host resources ram, cpu, bus cycles and depending on the hypervisor it may not even work. While the intel raid controller blows the software raid out of the water on sequential reads, surprisingly the windows software raid was better in nearly every other respect. It just has a boot helper to go along with it in the bios. That would be the case with any raid 1, not limited to software or hardware. May 30, 2015 i did a lot of reading on this and kind of conclude software and the fake hardware aka bios raid on my chipset are not really useful. I do agree though, that hardware raid is the best choice on business class windows servers or even important.
What is the difference between hardware raid and software raid. It is generally fine, however, to use windows software raid on simple storage. May 24, 2005 scott lowe responds to a techrepublic discussion and one members raid dilemma. Dedicated hardware controller doing the processing vs. It is used to improve disk io performance and reliability of your server or workstation.
With cheaper hardware raid you can also lose data if theres a power outage. Software raid does its processing on the server motherboard. Although we still find most of the information in that article. Ive ordered an areca 1280ml 24 port sata controller. Benefits and drawbacks of hybrid, hardwareassisted software raid. A software raid can also be affected if the host computer is heavily loaded. However, you are likely to find that putting an additional cpu in your server to speed up software raid is less expensive than. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie. Hardware raid vs os raid solutions experts exchange.
Software raid 5 vs hardware raid 5 anandtech forums. Well, i can not provide information via personal experience, as i have never ran any raid array off of the motherboard, but i have heard that the performance difference between software vs hardware raid 5 is drastic. Oct 30, 2015 while the intel raid controller blows the software raid out of the water on sequential reads, surprisingly the windows software raid was better in nearly every other respect. Raid 1e requires min of 3 disk, and raid 10 requires a min of 4 disk. Again, for the average joe and mary website or server this is far beyond their reality. Benefits and drawbacks of hybrid, hardware assisted software raid. As far as fault tolerance goes, ill respectfully disagree. Another limitation of linux software raid is expanding raid groups. One of the first questions we felt needed to be answered was what exactly hardware raid cards do. It is a way to virtualize multiple, independent hard disk drives into one or more arrays to. By definition, fake raid has no inherent benefits over honest software raid, they share all hardware and the os people have better watch over the implementations. Aug 09, 2007 well, i can not provide information via personal experience, as i have never ran any raid array off of the motherboard, but i have heard that the performance difference between software vs hardware raid 5 is drastic. Our take on the great religious debate, we made the case that hardware raid served virtually no purpose, and software raid was better in all important ways.
In this video from the lustre user group 20, alan poston from xyratex presents. Jul 06, 2011 reasons for using software raid versus a hardware raid setup. The biggest difference you are likely to see between the two is that software raid tends to be slower than hardware raid. Raid is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. It combines multiple inexpensive, small disk drives into an array of disks in order to provide redundancy, lower latency maximizing the chanc. A hp server that i work on had two disks in a raid1 array, one of my colleagues added an extra disk and made it a raid5, the hardware raid device moved the data around as appropriate while the machine was running and the disk space was expanded without any downtime. Additionally, hardware assisted software raid usually comes with a variety of drivers for the most popular operating systems, and therefore, is more os independent than pure software raid. The w7 software raid doesnt seem to notify the user when a disk fails. If you need more disk ports you can always get an hba host bus adapter card. A redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Software raid, as you might already know, is usually builtin on your os and unlike a hardware raid, you will need to spend a little extra on a controller card. Difference between hardware raid and software raid. Soft possibly the longest running battle in raid circles is which is faster, hardware raid or software raid. Raid hardware vs raid software what is your best option.
What is the performance implication of hardware vs software. What is the difference between a software and hardware raid. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. Before raid was raid, software disk mirroring raid 1 was a huge profit generator for system vendors, who sold it as an addon to their operating systems. If you can handle your system being down, for a drive replacement, and worst case, a. But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and. With software raid your data can be split across different enclosures for complete redundancy one can completely stop working and your data is still ok. Hi everyone, if you recall our previous article hardware raid or software raid. Obviously, hardware raid is pricier compared to software raid, due to the extra hardware that you need to purchase. You can easily move disks from a failed enclosure to a new one, and all your data is preserved.
I used to have 2x 160gb hard drives in software raid 1 and a single 500gb hard drive for storage. Raid 1 vs backup and software raid 1 vs hardware raid 1 h. Raid 5 with hot spare disks, raid 1 or 10 should be more tolerant. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and how much you want to pay. A brief history of raid raid has been around since 1970s 1989 berkeley paper was a taxonomy 1989 witnessed the first raid5 in software 1990s saw many hardware raid3, 5s lsi, 3ware, maxstrat, highpoint, intel 1990s also saw the introduction of raidframe mdraid came along in 2001.
First off, thank you all for your comments whether they were directly for my original questions or a pointer for software vs hardware raid. A brief history of raid raid has been around since 1970s 1989 berkeley paper was a taxonomy 1989 witnessed the first raid 5 in software 1990s saw many hardware raid 3, 5s lsi, 3ware, maxstrat, highpoint, intel. If anything they should be advised to increase ram and be done with it. Raid stands for redundant array of inexpensive disks. Differences between hardware raid, hbas, and software raid. Having said that, the above is because of the bbued cache. A hp server that i work on had two disks in a raid 1 array, one of my colleagues added an extra disk and made it a raid 5, the hardware raid device moved the data around as appropriate while the machine was running and the disk space was expanded without any downtime. All you need to do is connect the drives and configure the raid level you want.
Software vs hardware raid here in rhomelab, ive come to realize that there are a lot of stronglyopinionated people out there on the hardwaresoftware raid topic. So why can you not move arrays between software and hardware hosts with other raid type, is it to do with the parity algorithms. Scott lowe responds to a techrepublic discussion and one members raid dilemma. Regarding their differences, hw raid is usually hassle free and usually comes with hotswapability. Dec 21, 2005 the biggest difference you are likely to see between the two is that software raid tends to be slower than hardware raid. Having given both a fair go in various flavors over the years, i have come to generally prefer one over the other, and for my own reasons. Windows raid vs intel rst vs raidz vs hardware raid. Beyond that, hardware raid usually has at least options for battery backed or newer capacitorflash based write caches. After format and label the disk, still not able to detect u the unix and linux forums. It is usually os agnostic, so volumes are not specific to an os file system like software raid.
Jun, 2016 comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. Software raid is a type of raid implementation that utilizes operating systembased capabilities to construct and deliver raid services. Heavy processing can cause some pieces of data to be delayed by a small amount of time. For software raid i used the linux kernel software raid functionality of a system running 64bit fedora 9. However, you are likely to find that putting an additional cpu in your server to speed up software raid is less expensive than implementing hardware raid on custom hardware. Hardware raid is not a drag on your system and it is not based on corruptible files on your system.
Imho, im a big fan of kernel developers non directly related to zfs, so i really prefere mdadm to hardware raid. Plan to use software raid veritas volume mgr on c1t2d0 disk. Hardware raid vs software raid and data recovery so i have been going back and forth between setups for my home web server and file server. But the real question is whether you should use a hardware raid solution or a software raid solution. A raid can be deployed using both software and hardware. Raid redundant array of independent disks is one of the popular data storage virtualization technology.
But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and efficiency of raid will have to go with the hardware raid. Hardware raid 5e vs 6 vs 10 for home media server hardforum. A software raid can be prone to data corruption, due to the fault of the raid software or driver that is being used. Jul 07, 2009 a redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Raid 1 is simply a mirror and the simplicity of the system provides the reliability benefits. As the comments on my recent post apples new kickbutt file system showed, some folks cant believe that software raid could. The only point in using raid, is to handle a drive failure, without causing downtime. While you might think the computer you are using is the most important part of your everyday and professional workflows, there is. Software vs hardware raid here in rhomelab, ive come to realize that there are a lot of stronglyopinionated people out there on the hardware software raid topic. Hardware raid and implications for the future youtube. This is hardware raid and, honestly, im guessing it is slower than software raid if really tested, it lack the horsepower to anything much. Nov 16, 2007 another limitation of linux software raid is expanding raid groups. Additionally, hardwareassisted software raid usually comes with a variety of drivers for the most popular operating systems, and therefore, is more os independent than pure software raid. If you can handle your system being down, for a drive replacement, and worst case, a reinstall, then you dont need raid.
741 607 1033 1241 846 581 1327 545 525 911 1583 575 874 1226 460 735 1080 945 763 361 1045 320 1275 1065 998 1411 691 1350 1208 1150 1285 924 803 1061